1903 — Petition Concerning Adoption, Heirship and Management

Baba Budan Archives · Government-era Petitions

1903 — Petition Concerning Adoption, Heirship and Management

26 February 1903 · General and Revenue Secretariat · Muzrai File No. 101

ARCHIVE ID: BD-PET-1903-01

Historical context

Following disputes over succession and administration at the Baba Budan institution, a petition and supporting papers raised questions concerning an asserted adoption, hereditary succession, and the right to act as manager or agent. These matters were part of a larger government correspondence file containing multiple petitions and responses.

The documentary evidence

The supplied archival scan contains a petition-registration sheet around PDF page 41, dated in February 1903, followed by an English-language memorial, supporting references to agreements or Karars, and vernacular documentary leaves. The pages reproduced below are PDF pages 41–62 of the 98-page Muzrai File No. 101.

Important distinction: The petitioner’s account of adoption, heirship and authority is an allegation or representation in a historical petition. It must not be treated as an established finding, a validated family tree, or a present-day property entitlement. A government decision must be identified and assessed separately.

Key questions raised

The documents concern the basis on which an individual could claim to be the adopted son or heir of a former officeholder; the significance attributed to prior family agreements; and whether those claims justified appointment or recognition in the management of the institution. The petition and enclosures are valuable evidence of what was argued, but not conclusive proof that the arguments were accepted.

Original archival facsimiles

Presented in original PDF sequence, with no alteration to the manuscript wording. Select any image to view it full size. Because the handwriting varies in clarity, this page provides an editorial overview rather than a certified line-by-line transcription.

Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 41
Original facsimile · PDF page 41
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 42
Original facsimile · PDF page 42
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 43
Original facsimile · PDF page 43
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 44
Original facsimile · PDF page 44
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 45
Original facsimile · PDF page 45
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 46
Original facsimile · PDF page 46
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 47
Original facsimile · PDF page 47
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 48
Original facsimile · PDF page 48
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 49
Original facsimile · PDF page 49
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 50
Original facsimile · PDF page 50
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 51
Original facsimile · PDF page 51
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 52
Original facsimile · PDF page 52
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 53
Original facsimile · PDF page 53
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 54
Original facsimile · PDF page 54
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 55
Original facsimile · PDF page 55
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 56
Original facsimile · PDF page 56
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 57
Original facsimile · PDF page 57
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 58
Original facsimile · PDF page 58
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 59
Original facsimile · PDF page 59
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 60
Original facsimile · PDF page 60
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 61
Original facsimile · PDF page 61
Original Muzrai File 101 scan, PDF page 62
Original facsimile · PDF page 62

Source and archival note

Source: General and Revenue Secretariat, Mysore, Muzrai File No. 101 (1902–03), supplied 98-page historical scan, PDF pages 41–62. PDF page numbers refer to the digital image sequence and may differ from the original folio numbering.

Editorial note: Historical titles and names are retained where identifiable; uncertain handwritten details have not been silently completed. The institution’s administrative management and ownership of Inam lands are distinct questions.

Baba Budan Archives · Preserving primary historical evidence